Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Je Joue
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Note that the article is written in such a way that G11 would have been applicable. If userification is desired ping me. The Bushranger One ping only 02:04, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Je Joue (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 17:13, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No WP:CORP notability, or WP:GNG for that matter. The references don't stack up; all of the ANV references are adverts/press releases. The NYT article doesn't mention the company. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:27, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:35, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- delete/purge fluff Virtually all of the refs are AVN press releases and the article is written as advert. Company could possibly meet GNG as they are one of the major mfgrs of adult toys, and as refed in the article, the "rabbit" did get a scene or two on sex and the city, but at a minimum the page should be cut down to a sourced stub. Gaijin42 (talk) 18:39, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the referenced to articles by AVN, also the other NYT article. I referenced LELO as an example of what was acceptable when creating the page. Please let me know what other edits are required. Fz22gq —Preceding undated comment added 00:23, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.